Home Researchers Visiting Researchers
Visitors and Visiting Researchers to the Institute

Recent Visitors and Visiting Researchers to the Institute of Development Studies
Over the last few years the Institute of Development Studies (IDS) has been guests to a number of Visitors, including Researchers and Faculty from other Universities.

For the 2003/2004 academic year, Dr. Tracey Reynolds from the London South Bank University, United Kingdom visited to do research work on Guyana. Her area of focus was on the Inter-relationship between the Dynamics of Family Change and Processes of Social Capital.
During the said academic year Dr. Anthony Weis, a Canadian citizen joined the staff at the IDS as a Senior Researcher, spending eight (8) months (September 2003 – April 2004).
Academic year 2004/2005 was a very busy year for visitors.  Five (5) persons visited, three of whom came from the University of the West Indies campuses. They were:
Mr. Claremont Kirton, University of the West Indies, Mona Campus, Jamaica.
Dr. Roger Hosein, University of the West Indies, St Augustine Campus, Trinidad.
Sir George Alleyne, University of the West Indies, St Augustine Campus, Trinidad.
Dr. Kampta Karran, University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Dr. Peter Bracegirdle, Canadian International Development Agency


In 2006/2007 Ms. Jamie Owen from the University of Chicago, United States of America came on a scholarship through an arrangement with the Rotaract Club of Georgetown, Guyana and that of Chicago, United States of America. She was on a long-term attachment to the Institute as a visiting researcher.

For Academic year 2008/2009, Ms. Nina Mangelschots, University of Ghent, Brussels, Belgium was also attached to the Institute as a visiting researcher. Her area of focus was on Democracy in the Guyanas.  She was comparing Democracy in Guyana with that of neighbouring Suriname.  Ms. Caroline Shenaz Hossein from the University of Toronto, Canada visited for a short stay. She was due to return in 2010.
In the current Academic year (2009-2010) the IDS received three (3) visiting researchers. Mr. Robert Davis from the Sir Arthur Lewis Institute of Social and Economic Studies (SALISES), University of the West Indies, Jamaica spent a period of three months (November 2009 - February 2010). He is pursuing his MPhil/PhD in Governance. His research was based on the topic “Big South - Little South: A Comprehensive Look at South American Integration within the Context of IIRSA”.

Ms. Sarah E. Vaughn from the Department of Anthropology, Colombia University, United States of America is pursuing her PhD and her Thesis examines “Flooding, Vulnerable Publics and ‘Catastrophe’ Management and Governance in Guyana”.
Ms. Caroline Shenaz Hossein from the University of Toronto, Canada visited for a little over one month (April 13 - May 15, 2010). She is pursuing her PhD in Microfinance and her Study is based on “Politics of Microfinance in the Caribbean: A Comparative Study of Jamaica, Guyana and Haiti”.
Finally, Dr. Kalowatie Deonandan, an Associate Professor of Political Science from the University of Saskatchewan, Canada visited the IDS. She did a Round Table presentation for the Institute on Mining and Development.  

 

LCDS

The political economy of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)

Last week I concluded my rather extended discussion on the current global economic crisis and the lessons to be learnt from this. I trust readers would not infer from this that I believe the global crisis is over and we can safely return to business as usual. Far from it, while this is an appropriate point to introduce other topics to the discussion, I promise I will return to the global crisis if there are significant untoward developments in the coming weeks as we close out 2009 and enter into the New Year, 2010.

Read more ...

Norway’s deception: Partnership or capture of Guyana’s rainforest

In this column last week I started what I hope will be a fairly full assessment of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS). At the time of writing this column I have not been able to access the revised version of the Draft LCDS, which the government had promised to place in the National Assembly before the United Nations Climate Change Conference (Copenhagen Summit), which starts tomorrow. As I await the revised version of the LCDS, I shall confine my assessment to those topics which should not be significantly affected by likely revisions.

Read more ...

Norway And Guyana’s rainforest: Why beggars do not choose

For this week’s column, let me begin by re-emphasizing a couple of observations I have made about global inter-governmental negotiations thus far, as I continue to evaluate the low-carbon development strategy and the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), between the Government of Guyana and the Government of the Kingdom of Norway, as well as its related Joint Concept Note between the two parties to the agreement.
Diplomatic principle.

Read more ...

Norway and Guyana’s rainforest: Santa Claus or Old Higue

I hope that by now readers would have realised that Norway can in no way be looked upon as Guyana’s Santa Claus. I have also tried so far in recent columns to make it categorically clear that my principal intention is not simply to bash Norway as a historic polluter of the earth’s atmosphere. My main purpose in presenting Norway’s horrendous environmental profile is to assert the obligation this places on Guyanese to ensure our pristine forests are developed in an integrated, transparent, accountable and sustainable framework for the benefit of all Guyana. In particular to ensure that our national patrimony does not end up being mortgaged to the promotion of Norway’s studied and calculated efforts to deceive the world into believing that it cares more than any other nation about saving Planet Earth. As the saying goes “beware when Old Higue around looking for life blood.”

Read more ...

Rule or exception: Double standards and fighting global warming

‘Dirty secrets’
I hope that I have already indicated clearly Norway’s double standards in its climate change and global warming actions. More generally, its Santa Claus image has taken a serious beating in the approach to the just concluded Copenhagen Summit. In his Guardian Weekly column last September, Mark Curtis bemoaned the fact that in spite of Norway’s benign image abroad it had “become the home of four dirty little secrets.” One of these is of course the environmental sleight-of-hand I have been dealing with in these columns in previous weeks.

Read more ...